Diabetes and prediabetes risk
Chinese 6-Year Diabetes Risk Score
A points score from a study of adults aged 50 to 70 in Beijing and Shanghai that estimates the chance of type 2 diabetes within 6 years. It needs three blood test results: fasting glucose, HbA1c and C-reactive protein (CRP).
Your answers
Based on the published score, in our own words. Nothing you enter leaves this page.
Blood test results
Use results from a fasting blood test taken without diabetes medicine. CRP means the high-sensitivity CRP test (hs-CRP), in mg/L.
What you will see
Your score out of 17, whether it reaches the developers' cut point, the study's estimated chance of type 2 diabetes within 6 years and the points behind it.
Educational only, not medical advice. A risk estimate, not a diagnosis.
Source
Ye X et al., PLoS One 2014 (open access): points and 6-year risk from Table 2 of the paper, with the CRP unit (mg/L) from the journal's correction published the same year.
Validated in
1,912 adults aged 50 to 70 without diabetes from city and country communities in Beijing and Shanghai, China, recruited in 2005 and seen again in 2011. Diabetes at follow-up meant a fasting glucose of 7.0 mmol/L or more, an HbA1c of 6.5% or more, a doctor's diagnosis or diabetes medicine.
Limits
The score was checked only inside the same study (by cross-validation), not in a separate group of people. It was built in Chinese adults aged 50 to 70 and may not fit other ages or groups. Almost half of the people (924 of 1,912) developed diabetes by the study's criteria, most of them found by HbA1c alone, so the estimated risks are high. Fasting glucose was measured only once. It needs a CRP result, which is not part of most routine checkups. People who already have diabetes should not use it.
Which Chinese diabetes score is this?
This score looks ahead. It estimates the chance that someone aged 50 to 70 who does not have diabetes now will develop type 2 diabetes within 6 years, and it needs blood test results (Ye 2014). The Chinese Diabetes Risk Score answers a different question: whether you may already have diabetes without knowing it. It needs no blood test (Zhou 2013). If you have no recent blood test, start there. The Japanese diabetes risk score looks 3 years ahead (Nanri 2015), and the FINDRISC calculator from Finland looks 10 years ahead (Lindström 2003).
The points
| Factor | Answer | Points |
|---|---|---|
| Sex | Male / female | 0 / 1 |
| BMI (kg/m²) | Under 24 / 24 to under 28 / 28 or more | 0 / 1 / 2 |
| Fasting glucose (mmol/L) | Under 5.6 / 5.6 to under 6.1 / 6.1 or more | 0 / 3 / 6 |
| HbA1c (%) | Under 5.5 / 5.5 to under 5.9 / 5.9 or more | 0 / 2 / 5 |
| High blood pressure | No / yes | 0 / 1 |
| CRP (mg/L) | Under 0.39 / 0.39 to 0.99 / 1.00 or more | 0 / 1 / 2 |
| Highest possible score | 17 |
Points from Table 2 of the paper (Ye 2014). The paper first printed the CRP unit as mmol/L. A correction later in 2014 changed it to mg/L (Ye 2014). CRP was measured with a high-sensitivity test, and the three CRP groups are the thirds of the study's own values. High blood pressure meant 140/90 mmHg or more, or taking blood pressure medicine (Ye 2014). Fasting glucose in mg/dL divided by 18 gives mmol/L, so 5.6 and 6.1 mmol/L are about 101 and 110 mg/dL.
Example: a 58-year-old woman with a BMI of 25, normal blood pressure, a fasting glucose of 5.8 mmol/L, an HbA1c of 5.7% and a CRP of 0.5 mg/L scores 1 (female) + 1 (BMI) + 3 (glucose) + 2 (HbA1c) + 1 (CRP) = 8. Table 2 puts the 6-year chance of diabetes at a score of 8 at 61% (Ye 2014).
What the score means
Table 2 turns each total into an estimated chance of developing type 2 diabetes within 6 years. It runs from 20% at a score of 0 to 92% at 17 (Ye 2014). These figures are high because 924 of the 1,912 people developed diabetes during the study, and 72.4% of the new cases were found by an HbA1c of 6.5% or more (Ye 2014). In a group where diabetes is less common, the same score would likely mean a lower chance.
A score of 7 or more was the cut point that best balanced finding future cases against flagging people who stayed free of diabetes. It picked up 55.5% of the people who went on to get diabetes, and 75.4% of those who did not scored under 7. The points score separated the two groups with an area under the curve of 0.714 (95% CI 0.691 to 0.737), better than the other East Asian scores the authors tested in the same people (Ye 2014). The authors say the score has not been checked in a separate group of people and may not fit outside ages 50 to 70 (Ye 2014).
What to do with your result
A score at or above the cut point is a reason to ask your doctor about follow-up blood sugar tests and about steps that lower diabetes risk, such as weight loss and more activity. A score below it does not rule diabetes out. If your fasting glucose is 7.0 mmol/L (126 mg/dL) or more, or your HbA1c is 6.5% or more, the calculator will not score you. Those values are in the diabetes range, and the study left such people out (Ye 2014). In the US, the US Preventive Services Task Force recommends screening for prediabetes and type 2 diabetes in adults aged 35 to 70 who have overweight or obesity (USPSTF 2021), whatever any risk score says.
See also the Chinese Diabetes Risk Score, the Japanese diabetes risk score, the Korean diabetes risk score, the FINDRISC calculator, the A1C to average glucose converter, prediabetes ranges and next steps and the BMI calculator.
Sources
- Ye X, Zong G, Liu X, et al. Development of a new risk score for incident type 2 diabetes using updated diagnostic criteria in middle-aged and older Chinese. PLoS One. 2014;9(5):e97042. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0097042. PMID 24819157. Correction: PLoS One. 2014;9(12):e115929 (CRP unit mg/L). pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4018395/
- US Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for Prediabetes and Type 2 Diabetes: Recommendation Statement. JAMA. 2021;326(8):736-743. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/recommendation/screening-for-prediabetes-and-type-2-diabetes
- Zhou X, Qiao Q, Ji L, et al. Nonlaboratory-based risk assessment algorithm for undiagnosed type 2 diabetes developed on a nation-wide diabetes survey. Diabetes Care. 2013;36(12):3944-3952. doi:10.2337/dc13-0593. PMID 24144651. pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3836161/
- Nanri A, Nakagawa T, Kuwahara K, et al. Development of risk score for predicting 3-year incidence of type 2 diabetes: Japan Epidemiology Collaboration on Occupational Health Study. PLoS One. 2015;10(11):e0142779. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0142779. PMID 26558900. Correction: PLoS One. 2018;13(6):e0199075 (corrected Table 5). pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4641714/
- Lindström J, Tuomilehto J. The diabetes risk score: a practical tool to predict type 2 diabetes risk. Diabetes Care. 2003;26(3):725-731. PMID 12610029. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12610029/
Written and maintained by the uncovermyrisk.com editorial team. We do not have a medical reviewer; every claim links to its primary source above. Last reviewed: 2026-11-05. Spotted an error? See About.